Home
Firm Overview
Attorneys and Staff
Areas of Practice
News & Publications
Legal Resources
Locations
Login

Mass Litigation Panel Litigation

Home > Areas of Practice > Mass Litigation Panel Litigation

West Virginia is one of the few states which has created a special judicial forum to handle mass litigation cases. West Virginia Trial Court Rule 26.01 et seq. prescribes the criteria for referral to the Mass Litigation Panel.

(c) 'Mass litigation' shall be defined as two (2) or more civil actions pending in one or more circuit courts: (a) involving common questions of law or fact in mass accidents or single catastrophic events in which a number of people are injured; or (b) involving common questions of law or fact in 'personal injury mass torts' allegedly incurred upon numerous claimants in connection with widely available or mass-marketed products and their manufacture, design, use, implantation, ingestion, or exposure; or (c) involving common questions of law or fact in 'property damage mass torts' allegedly incurred upon numerous claimants in connection with claims for replacement or repair of allegedly defective products, including those in which claimants seek compensation for the failure of the product to perform as intended with resulting damage to the product itself or other property, with or without personal injury overtones; or (d) involving common questions of law or fact in 'economic loss' cases incurred by numerous claimants asserting defect claims similar to those in property damage circumstances which are in the nature of consumer fraud or warranty actions on a grand scale including allegations of the existence of a defect without actual product failure or injury.

(e) Any party, judge, or the Administrative Director of the Courts may seek a referral to the Panel for transfer of actions by filing a Motion to Refer to Mass Litigation Panel in any circuit court in which a qualified case is pending. The motion shall identify the nature of the actions sought to be referred, the number of plaintiffs, the number of defendants, the number of actions pending, the basis for the request, a listing of the particular cases in all the circuits for which a referral is being requested, and, if known, whether additional related actions may be filed in the future.

Said motion may be filed within six (6) months after the filing date of the case in which the motion is being filed; provided, however, that a judge or the Administrative Director may file said motion at any time, if it is determined that litigation qualifies as mass litigation and that the litigation may be resolved more expeditiously by reference to the Panel.

The motion shall be served on all parties, all judges in actions which are the subject of the motion, and the Administrative Director. Any party shall have twenty (20) days after the motion is filed to file a reply memorandum stating its position and opposition, if any. Any affected judge may file a reply memorandum within ten (10) days thereafter. . . .


For a client subjected to the Mass Litigation Panel system, it is important to have a law firm which is experienced with the system. F3 has represented clients before the Mass Litigation Panel in every year since its creation. Our clients have participated in the only medical monitoring jury trial convened by the Mass Litigation Panel. The favorable verdict is presently on appeal before the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. Our client is presently involved in a class action pending before the Mass Litigation Panel.

Mass litigation cases have multiplied in recent years. Mass Litigation Panel experience is indispensable in selecting a lawyer. The breadth and depth of this experience benefits each prospective client.

F3 accepts representations in mass litigation matters throughout the state of West Virginia.

Attorneys
Michael J. Farrell (Practice Leader) More information about Michael J. Farrell
Tamela J. White More information about Tamela J. White
Paul T. Farrell More information about Paul T. Farrell
Joseph M. Farrell Jr. More information about Joseph M. Farrell Jr.
Charlotte A. Hoffman Norris More information about Charlotte A. Hoffman Norris
Erik W. Legg More information about Erik W. Legg
Bernard S. Vallejos More information about Bernard S. Vallejos
 
Publications
Medical Monitoring Claims in West Virginia - 50 State Survey of Medical Monitoring: A Report of the Pharmaceuticals and Biologicals Subcommittee of the Product Liability Committee, American Bar Association - Section of Litigation (November, 2001)
 
Seminars
Panel Member, “Electronic Discovery.”, Kanawha County Bar Association Meeting (Charleston, West Virginia, May 5, 2009)
Electronic Discovery - An Overview, Defense Trial Counsel of West Virginia Annual Meeting (Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, June 18, 2007).
Documentation Issues And Charting For The Future In West Virginia, Lorman Education Center CLE Seminar (February, 2003)
Confidentially: Managing Health Information in a Changing Environment, Medical Legal Update 1997, Lorman Business Center, Inc.
 
Cases
In re West Virginia Rezulin Litigation, __ W. Va. ___, 585 S.E.2d 52 (2003)
In re West Virginia Rezulin Litigation, 2001 WL 1818442 (W.Va. Cir. Ct., Dec. 13. 2001)
Verba v. Graphery, 210 W. Va. 30, 552 S.E.2d 406 (2001) (Amicus Curiae)

 

 

© Farrell, Farrell & Farrell, PLLC
All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer | Contact Us
Web by GreenMan Design